Determination of the Material Model and Damage Parameters of a Carbon Fiber Reinforced Laminated Epoxy Composite for High Strain Rate Planar Compression
Loading...
Date
2021
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd.
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The progressive failure of a 0°/90° laminated carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composite was modeled in LS-DYNA using the MAT_162 material model, including the strain rate, damage progression and anisotropy effects. In addition to conventional standard and non-standard tests, double-shear and Brazilian tests were applied to determine the through-thickness shear modulus and the through-thickness tensile strength of the composite, respectively. The modulus reduction and strain softening for shear and delamination parameters were calibrated by low velocity drop-weight impact tests. The rate sensitivities of the modulus and strength of in-plane and through-thickness direction were determined by the compression tests at quasi-static and high strain rates. The fidelity of the determined model parameters was finally verified in the in-plane and through-thickness direction by the 3D numerical models of the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar compression tests. The numerical bar stresses and damage progressions modes showed acceptable correlations with those of the experiments in both directions. The composite failed both numerically and experimentally by the fiber buckling induced fiber-matrix axial splitting in the in-plane and the matrix shear fracture in the through-thickness direction. © 2020
Description
Keywords
Carbon fiber composite, Compression, High strain rate, MAT_162, Progressive damage
Fields of Science
0203 mechanical engineering, 02 engineering and technology, 0210 nano-technology
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
18
Source
International Journal of Impact Engineering
Volume
149
Issue
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 22
Scopus : 24
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 29
SCOPUS™ Citations
24
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
23
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Page Views
1808
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Downloads
226
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Google Scholar™


