Modeling Leakage of Ephemeral Secrets in Tripartite/Group Key Exchange
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Recent advances in the design and analysis of secure two-party key exchange (2KE) such as the leakage of ephemeral secrets used during the attacked sessions remained unnoticed by the current models for group key exchange (GKE). Focusing on a special case of GKE - the tripartite key exchange (3KE) - that allows for efficient one-round protocols, we demonstrate how to incorporate these advances to the multi-party setting. From this perspective our work closes the most pronounced gap between provably secure 2KE and GKE protocols. The proposed 3KE protocol is an implicitly authenticated protocol with one communication round which remains secure even in the event of ephemeral secret leakage. It also significantly improves upon currently known 3KE protocols, many of which are insecure. An optional key confirmation round can be added to our proposal to achieve the explicitly authenticated protocol variant. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.
Description
12th International Conference on Information Security and Cryptology, ICISC 2009; Seoul; South Korea; 2 December 2009 through 4 December 2009
Keywords
Network protocols, Communication rounds, Cryptography, Group key exchange, Provably secure, Group key exchange, Communication rounds, Cryptography, Network protocols, Provably secure
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
Manulis, M., Suzuki, K., and Ustaoğlu, B. (2010). Modeling leakage of ephemeral secrets in tripartite/group key exchange. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5984 LNCS, 16-33. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14423-3_2
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
17
Volume
5984 LNCS
Issue
Start Page
16
End Page
33
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 16
Scopus : 24
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 11
Google Scholar™


