The Impact of Planimetric Configuration on Structurally Damaged Residential Buildings
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Kazanasmaz, Zehra Tuğçe
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This study was conducted to determine a significant relationship between planimetric configuration and vulnerability of hazardous buildings located in seismic zones by developing design and construction efficiency indicators. Case study examples were chosen from residential buildings in Bolu, Düzce and Kaynasli in Turkey, which were damaged by the 1999 earthquakes. Utilizing field survey drawings, efficiency quotients; compactness quotients; construction efficiency ratios; aspect ratios and height-to-base ratios were defined as planimetric configuration indicators. The significant relationship between these aspects and the damage level of buildings were determined through statistical analyses and scatter charts. Planimetric configuration - including building geometry, cantilever projections and layout of columns -was reviewed according to the Turkish Earthquake Code. Findings revealed certain dependencies for efficiency ratios, which would satisfactorily predict the seismic vulnerability of buildings based on planimetric configuration. Researchers in the field of architecture who are engaged in earthquake-resistant design may use the general methodology. In addition, architects and structural engineers can use this approach presented here to evaluate their design.
Description
Keywords
Earthquake-resistant design, Earthquakes, Planimetric configuration, Residential buildings, Structural damage, Residential buildings, Earthquake-resistant design, Planimetric configuration, Earthquakes, Structural damage
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology, 0201 civil engineering
Citation
Kazanasmaz, Z. T. (2009). The impact of planimetric configuration on structurally damaged residential buildings. Architectural Science Review, 52(1), 54-70. doi:10.3763/asre.2008.0046
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
1
Volume
52
Issue
1
Start Page
54
End Page
70
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 3
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 9
SCOPUS™ Citations
3
checked on Apr 28, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
3
checked on Apr 28, 2026
Page Views
767
checked on Apr 28, 2026
Downloads
439
checked on Apr 28, 2026
Google Scholar™


