Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends on the Thermochemical Conversion of Plastics During 1990-2020
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The aim of this bibliometric analysis was to evaluate the trends in literature and the impact of publications that have been published during the period 1990-2020, in the field of thermochemical conversion of plastics, namely gasification, liquefaction and pyrolysis. SCOPUS was used and data was vetted via MS Excel, with analysis being completed via MS Excel and VOSViewer. A total of 1705 publications were used in the study, and China was identified as the most productive country. Pyrolysis was the most researched technology with over 88% of publications, while liquefaction accounted for less than 3% of the total publications. Across all three technologies, polyethylene (PE) was the most commonly occurring type of plastic. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis had the highest number of publications and total citations. However, Energy Conversion and Management had a higher impact factor and higher average citations per publication. University of Alicante was identified as the most productive university with a total of 45 publications, while University of Leeds was the most commonly cited with an average of 65 citations per publication. The keyword analysis showed that copyrolysis with biomass and catalytic pyrolysis are gaining increased interests.
Description
Keywords
Bibliometric analysis, Gasification, Liquefaction, Plastic, Pyrolysis, Thermochemical conversion, Bibliometric analysis, plastic, liquefaction, gasification, pyrolysis
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
26
Volume
317
Issue
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 8
Scopus : 39
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 112
Google Scholar™


