Cocoa Pudding Fortified With Microencapsulated Lactiplantibacillus Plantarum Dsm 1954
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Probiotic pudding can be served as a functional food with high probiotic viability during production and storage. The aim of this study was to investigate the microencapsulation of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum DSM 1954 with a gum arabic-whey protein concentrate complex using a water-in-oil emulsion technique and to evaluate the stability of microencapsulated and non-microencapsulated L. plantarum in the cocoa pudding and to determine the main quality parameters and sensory characteristics of pudding during storage at 4 °C for 21 d. The efficacy of microencapsulation on the viability over 21 d was determined and an encapsulation efficiency of 86.66% was achieved. Whole milk, cocoa, corn starch, and gum arabic, as well as microencapsulated and non-microencapsulated L. plantarum were used to produce probiotic-fortified cocoa pudding. L. plantarum was added to pudding for 21 d to test their viability and stability. pH values and sensory analysis of pudding were conducted. Microencapsulated and non-microencapsulated L. plantarum cell counts were approximately 9 log CFU/g in pudding samples at the end of 21 d. With storage time, the pH of pudding containing non-microencapsulated bacteria decreased more than that of pudding containing microencapsulated bacteria. The addition of bacteria to the pudding did not have a significant effect on the taste, odor, and texture. Since both microencapsulated and non-microencapsulated bacteria maintain significant viability in pudding during storage, pudding can be considered a potential carrier of probiotics. © 2023 by the author(s).
Description
Keywords
Functional foods, Gum arabic, Microencapsulation, Probiotic
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
Volume
3
Issue
Start Page
0
End Page
0
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 2
Scopus : 3
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 9
SCOPUS™ Citations
3
checked on Apr 29, 2026
Page Views
61
checked on Apr 29, 2026
Downloads
1
checked on Apr 29, 2026
Google Scholar™


