Fuzzy Logic Model for the Prediction of Cement Compressive Strength
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
A fuzzy logic prediction model for the 28-day compressive strength of cement mortar under standard curing conditions was created. Data collected from a cement plant were used in the model construction and testing. The input variables of alkali, Blaine, SO3, and C3S and the output variable of 28-day cement strength were fuzzified by the use of artificial neural networks (ANNs), and triangular membership functions were employed for the fuzzy subsets. The Mamdani fuzzy rules relating the input variables to the output variable were created by the ANN model and were laid out in the If-Then format. Product (prod) inference operator and the centre of gravity (COG; centroid) defuzzification methods were employed. The prediction of 50 sets of the 28-day cement strength data by the developed fuzzy model was quite satisfactory. The average percentage error levels in the fuzzy model were successfully low (2.69%). The model was compared with the ANN model for its error levels and ease of application. The results indicated that through the application of fuzzy logic algorithm, a more user friendly and more explicit model than the ANNs could be produced within successfully low error margins.
Description
Keywords
Artificial neural networks, Compressive strength, Fuzzy logic, Concretes, Defuzzification, Fuzzy logic, Artificial neural networks, Concretes, Compressive strength, Defuzzification
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology, 0210 nano-technology
Citation
Akkurt, S., Tayfur, G., and Can, S. (2004). Fuzzy logic model for the prediction of cement compressive strength. Cement and Concrete Research, 34(8), 1429-1433. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.01.020
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
165
Volume
34
Issue
8
Start Page
1429
End Page
1433
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 172
Scopus : 203
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 179
Google Scholar™


