Generating Ontologies From Relational Data With Fuzzy-Syllogistic Reasoning
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Kumova, Bora İsmail
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Existing standards for crisp description logics facilitate information exchange between systems that reason with crisp ontologies. Applications with probabilistic or possibilistic extensions of ontologies and reasoners promise to capture more information, because they can deal with more uncertainties or vagueness of information. However, since there are no standards for either extension, information exchange between such applications is not generic. Fuzzy-syllogistic reasoning with the fuzzy-syllogistic system4S provides 2048 possible fuzzy inference schema for every possible triple concept relationship of an ontology. Since the inference schema are the result of all possible set-theoretic relationships between three sets with three out of 8 possible fuzzy-quantifiers, the whole set of 2048 possible fuzzy inferences can be used as one generic fuzzy reasoner for quantified ontologies. In that sense, a fuzzy syllogistic reasoner can be employed as a generic reasoner that combines possibilistic inferencing with probabilistic ontologies, thus facilitating knowledge exchange between ontology applications of different domains as well as information fusion over them.
Description
Keywords
Fuzzy logic, Ontology learning, Relational database systems, Syllogistic reasoning, Fuzzy logic, Relational database systems, Ontology learning, Syllogistic reasoning
Fields of Science
0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
Kumova, B. İ. (2015). Generating ontologies from relational data with fuzzy-syllogistic reasoning. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 521, 21-32. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18422-7_2
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
5
Volume
521
Issue
Start Page
21
End Page
32
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 5
Scopus : 5
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 9
Google Scholar™


