Predicting Suspended Sediment Loads and Missing Data for Gediz River, Turkey
| dc.contributor.author | Ülke, Aslı | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tayfur, Gökmen | |
| dc.contributor.author | Özkul, Sevinç | |
| dc.coverage.doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000060 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-11-22T09:28:26Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-11-22T09:28:26Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Prediction of suspended sediment load (SSL) is important for water resources quantity and quality studies. The SSL of a stream is generally determined by direct measurement of the suspended sediment concentration or by employing sediment rating curve method. Although direct measurement is the most reliable method, it is very expensive, time consuming, and, in many instances, problematic for inaccessible sections, especially during floods. On the other hand, measuring precipitation and flow discharge is relatively easier and hence, there are more rain and flow gauging stations than SSL gauging stations in Turkey. Furthermore, due to its cost, measurements of SSL are carried out in longer periods compared to precipitation and flow measurements. Although daily precipitation and flow measurements are available for most of the Turkish river basins, at best semimonthly measurements are available for SSL. As such, it is essential to predict SSL from precipitation and flow data and to fill the gap for the missing data records. This study employed artificial intelligence methods of artificial neural networks (ANN) and neurofuzzy inference system, the sediment rating curve method, multilinear regression, and multinonlinear regression methods for this purpose. The comparative analysis of the results showed that the artificial intelligence methods have superiority over the other methods for predicting semimonthly suspended sediment loads. The ANN using conjugate gradient optimization method showed the best performance among the proposed models. It also satisfactorily generated daily SSL data for the missing period record of Gediz River, Turkey. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ülke, A., Tayfur, G., and Özkul, S. (2009). Predicting suspended sediment loads and missing data for Gediz River, Turkey. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 14(9), 954-965. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000060 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000060 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000060 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0733-9429 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1084-0699 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1943-5584 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-69249148310 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000060 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11147/2492 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Hydrologic Engineering | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Fuzzy sets | en_US |
| dc.subject | Hydrologic data | en_US |
| dc.subject | Hydrologic models | en_US |
| dc.subject | Regression analysis | en_US |
| dc.subject | Suspended sediment | en_US |
| dc.subject | Flow measurement | en_US |
| dc.title | Predicting Suspended Sediment Loads and Missing Data for Gediz River, Turkey | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| gdc.author.institutional | Tayfur, Gökmen | |
| gdc.bip.impulseclass | C5 | |
| gdc.bip.influenceclass | C4 | |
| gdc.bip.popularityclass | C4 | |
| gdc.coar.access | open access | |
| gdc.coar.type | text::journal::journal article | |
| gdc.collaboration.industrial | false | |
| gdc.description.department | İzmir Institute of Technology. Civil Engineering | en_US |
| gdc.description.endpage | 965 | en_US |
| gdc.description.issue | 9 | en_US |
| gdc.description.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| gdc.description.scopusquality | Q3 | |
| gdc.description.startpage | 954 | en_US |
| gdc.description.volume | 14 | en_US |
| gdc.description.wosquality | Q3 | |
| gdc.identifier.openalex | W2015577873 | |
| gdc.identifier.wos | WOS:000269061800007 | |
| gdc.index.type | WoS | |
| gdc.index.type | Scopus | |
| gdc.oaire.accesstype | BRONZE | |
| gdc.oaire.diamondjournal | false | |
| gdc.oaire.impulse | 2.0 | |
| gdc.oaire.influence | 4.460182E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.isgreen | true | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Flow measurement | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Fuzzy sets | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Hydrologic models | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Suspended sediment | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Hydrologic data | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Regression analysis | |
| gdc.oaire.popularity | 1.6154434E-8 | |
| gdc.oaire.publicfunded | false | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0207 environmental engineering | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 02 engineering and technology | |
| gdc.openalex.collaboration | National | |
| gdc.openalex.fwci | 1.50963597 | |
| gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile | 0.83 | |
| gdc.openalex.toppercent | TOP 10% | |
| gdc.opencitations.count | 38 | |
| gdc.plumx.crossrefcites | 30 | |
| gdc.plumx.mendeley | 52 | |
| gdc.plumx.scopuscites | 49 | |
| gdc.scopus.citedcount | 49 | |
| gdc.wos.citedcount | 37 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | c04aa74a-2afd-4ce1-be50-e0f634f7c53d | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 9af2b05f-28ac-4020-8abe-a4dfe192da5e |
