Seismic Performance of Cfrp Jacketed Sub-Standard Rc Columns Under High Axial Stress and Shear Demand

dc.contributor.author Demir, Merve Nur
dc.contributor.author Demir, Uğur
dc.contributor.author Demir, Cem
dc.contributor.author İlki, Alper
dc.date.accessioned 2022-08-02T11:13:58Z
dc.date.available 2022-08-02T11:13:58Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.description.abstract In the last decades, lessons learnt from the major earthquakes, that occurred in many countries, brought revisions in prevailing seismic design codes. As a consequence of this phenomenon, the current building stock in Turkey is mainly comprised of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings which were designed according to different seismic design codes. The presented paper is a component of a comprehensive investigation which containing three variables i) high axial load ratio defined as axial load divided by the axial capacity, ii) high shear demand defined as the ratio of shear demand at flexural yielding to shear resistance and iii) low transverse reinforcement ratio owing to large spacing among steel reinforcements. Thus, a total of four full-scale square RC columns comprised of i) one column designed to comply with the former Turkish Seismic Design Code (TSDC, 1975) and ii) three columns which are not compliant to any design codes (referred as sub-standard), were tested under high axial load ratio, 0.4 for code-conforming and 0.75 for sub-standard columns, combined with reversed cyclic lateral loading. The columns were also designed to have high shear demand in the order of 0.62 and 0.80 for bare sub-standard according to ACI 318 (2019) and TBEC (2018) design codes as sometimes observed in existing sub-standard structures. In addition to that, the ratio of shear demand for the code-conforming column is calculated 0.43 and 0.50 as per design codes, respectively. Besides, the ratio of transverse reinforcement area to the minimum required transverse reinforcement area was 0.19 and 0.77 for sub-standard columns according to ACI 318 (2019) and TBEC (2018), respectively. For the code-conforming column, the aforementioned ratio was 0.57 and 1.32 for both design codes, in the same manner. One of the sub-standard columns was kept as a reference column while the other two of them have been externally jacketed with one layer or two layers of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) sheets. Test results pointed out that the confinement provided by CFRP jacketing has remarkably improved the performance of seismically-deficient RC columns subjected to high axial compression under high shear demand in terms of lateral load capacity and ductility. The experimental results were also supplemented with theoretical work to evaluate the effects of CFRP jacketing on the seismic behavior of sub-standard RC columns. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/978-3-030-88166-5 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/978-3-030-88166-5_111
dc.identifier.isbn 978-3-030-88165-8 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2366-2557
dc.identifier.issn 2366-2557 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85121908517
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88166-5_111
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/11147/12237
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer en_US
dc.relation 10th International Conference on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering: Proceedings of CICE 2020/2021 en_US
dc.relation 10th International Conference on Fibre-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites in Civil Engineering, CICE 2021 en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject CFRP en_US
dc.subject Column en_US
dc.subject Retrofitting en_US
dc.subject Seismic performance en_US
dc.title Seismic Performance of Cfrp Jacketed Sub-Standard Rc Columns Under High Axial Stress and Shear Demand en_US
dc.type Conference Object en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id 0000-0001-8319-2535
gdc.author.id 0000-0001-8319-2535 en_US
gdc.author.institutional Demir, Uğur
gdc.bip.impulseclass C4
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::conference output
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.contributor.affiliation İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.contributor.affiliation Izmir Institute of Technology en_US
gdc.contributor.affiliation İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.contributor.affiliation İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.department İzmir Institute of Technology. Civil Engineering en_US
gdc.description.endpage 1290 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Konferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q4
gdc.description.startpage 1278 en_US
gdc.description.volume 198 LNCE en_US
gdc.description.wosquality N/A
gdc.identifier.openalex W4200399423
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000767193200111
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 5.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.8788691E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 5.965777E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 3.12113721
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.93
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 5
gdc.plumx.mendeley 10
gdc.scopus.citedcount 3
gdc.wos.citedcount 0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9072a27f-6e64-427a-a35a-84a72e554a92
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9af2b05f-28ac-4026-8abe-a4dfe192da5e

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: