Thiolene- and Polycaprolactone Methacrylate-Based Polymerized High Internal Phase Emulsion (polyhipe) Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering
Loading...
Date
Authors
Aldemir Dikici, Betül
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Highly porous emulsion templated polymers (PolyHIPEs) provide a number of potential advantages in the fabrication of scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Porosity enables cell ingrowth and nutrient diffusion within, as well as waste removal from, the scaffold. The properties offered by emulsion templating alone include the provision of high interconnected porosity, and, in combination with additive manufacturing, the opportunity to introduce controlled multiscale porosity to complex or custom structures. However, the majority of monomer systems reported for PolyHIPE preparation are unsuitable for clinical applications as they are nondegradable. Thiol-ene chemistry is a promising route to produce biodegradable photocurable PolyHIPEs for the fabrication of scaffolds using conventional or additive manufacturing methods; however, relatively little research has been reported on this approach. This study reports the groundwork to fabricate thiol- and polycaprolactone (PCL)-based PolyHIPE materials via a photoinitiated thiolene click reaction. Two different formulations, either three-arm PCL methacrylate (3PCLMA) or four-arm PCL methacrylate (4PCLMA) moieties, were used in the PolyHIPE formulation. Biocompatibility of the PolyHIPEs was investigated using human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) and human osteosarcoma cell line (MG-63) by DNA quantification assay, and developed PolyHIPEs were shown to be capable of supporting cell attachment and viability.
Description
Fields of Science
02 engineering and technology, 0210 nano-technology
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
31
Source
Biomacromolecules
Volume
23
Issue
Start Page
720
End Page
730
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 7
Scopus : 46
PubMed : 9
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 69
SCOPUS™ Citations
46
checked on Jun 12, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
46
checked on Jun 12, 2026
Page Views
19013
checked on Jun 12, 2026
Downloads
12
checked on Jun 12, 2026
Google Scholar™




