Modeling of Coal Bed Methane (cbm) Production and Co2 Sequestration in Coal Seams
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Özdemir, Ekrem
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
A mathematical model was developed to predict the coal bed methane (CBM) production and carbon dioxide (CO2) sequestration in a coal seam accounting for the coal seam properties. The model predictions showed that, for a CBM production and dewatering process, the pressure could be reduced from 15.17 MPa to 1.56 MPa and the gas saturation increased up to 50% in 30 years for a 5.4 × 105 m2 of coal formation. For the CO2 sequestration process, the model prediction showed that the CO2 injection rate was first reduced and then slightly recovered over 3 to 13 years of injection, which was also evidenced by the actual in seam data. The model predictions indicated that the sweeping of the water in front of the CO2 flood in the cleat porosity could be important on the loss of injectivity. Further model predictions suggested that the injection rate of CO2 could be about 11 × 103 m3 per day; the injected CO2 would reach the production well, which was separated from the injection well by 826 m, in about 30 years. During this period, about 160 × 106 m3 of CO2 could be stored within a 21.4 × 105 m2 of coal seam with a thickness of 3 m.
Description
Keywords
CO2, Coalbed methane, Modeling, Sequestration, Coal gas, Coal gas, Coalbed methane, Modeling, Sequestration, CO2
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
Özdemir, E. (2009). Modeling of coal bed methane (CBM) production and CO2 sequestration in coal seams. International Journal of Coal Geology, 77(1-2), 145-152. doi:10.1016/j.coal.2008.09.003
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
60
Volume
77
Issue
1-2
Start Page
145
End Page
152
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 60
Scopus : 80
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 118
SCOPUS™ Citations
80
checked on May 02, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
70
checked on May 02, 2026
Page Views
876
checked on May 02, 2026
Downloads
832
checked on May 02, 2026
Google Scholar™


