Biologically Informed Decision-Making for PMRT in PT3N0M0 Luminal Breast Cancers (Protocol MF22-02): International Multicenter Real-World Data

dc.contributor.author Soran, Atilla
dc.contributor.author Gultekin, Melis Bahadir
dc.contributor.author Venkatesulu, Bhanu Prasad
dc.contributor.author Barry, Parul Nafees
dc.contributor.author King, Caleb
dc.contributor.author Bhargava, Rohit
dc.contributor.author Vargo, John Austin
dc.date.accessioned 2025-06-26T20:20:31Z
dc.date.available 2025-06-26T20:20:31Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.description.abstract Two hundred and 2 women from 16 centers with pT3N0M0 hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2 negative BC who underwent mastectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: PMRT (n = 130) and no PMRT (n = 69). Groups were compared in terms of overall survival (OS), loco-regional recurrence (LRR) rate, and distant metastases (DM) in light of Magee Equations Score (MS). At a median follow-up of 51.3 months for the no PMRT group and 65.9 months for the PMRT group (P =.041), 9% (n = 6) of patients from the no PMRT group and 2% (n = 3) from the PMRT group developed LRR (P = 0.047). There was no difference in local recurrence (1% in no PMRT group vs. 2% in PMRT group; P =.7) and distant recurrence (7% in no PMRT group vs. 3% in PMRT group; P =.16) in patients who received PMRT and no PMRT. Further comparison of the LRR in the no PMRT and PMRT groups in patients with an MS < 18 did not show a significant difference (3% vs. 4%; P =.64). However, among patients with an MS >= 18, no PMRT group had a higher LRR rate compared to the PMRT group (11% vs. 2%; P =.01). In patients with an MS >= 18, the administration of PMRT correlates with statistically significantly better LRR-free survival (HR 0.19; 95% CI 0.05-0.79; P =.02). Patients with MS <18 experience a comparable rate of recurrence irrespective of PMRT, while those with MS >= 18 have higher rates of LRR and thus should not omit PMRT. Background: Current guidelines do not list definitive recommendations for postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in patients with luminal pT3N0M0 breast cancer (BC). Increased data suggests de-escalation of radiation therapy (RT) in genomically defined biologically favorable luminal BCs. The goal of this study is to determine whether PMRT can be safely omitted for this specific subgroup of patients. Methods and materials: Two hundred and 2 women from 16 centers with pT3N0M0 hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2 negative BC who underwent mastectomy were retrospectively analyzed. No patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Three patients were excluded because of positive surgical margins. Patients were divided into 2 groups: PMRT (n = 130) and no PMRT (n = 69). Groups were compared in terms of overall survival (OS), loco-regional recurrence (LRR) rate, and distant metastases (DM) in light of the Magee Equations Score (MS), menopausal status/age, axillary surgery, pathology, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), adjuvant chemotherapy, and adjuvant endocrine therapy. Results: The majority of the patients had invasive ductal carcinoma (49%, n = 98). There was no significant difference regarding tumor size, axillary surgery, and adjuvant endocrine therapy between the 2 groups (P =.82, P =.28, P =.12, respectively). LVI was 19% (n = 39), and it was greater in the PMRT group (25% vs. 10%; P =.01). Patients in the PMRT group received more chemotherapy (66% vs. 30%; P <.001), had more grade 3 tumors (28% vs. 9%, P =.005), and were more premenopausal (49% vs. 22%; P =.0001). At a median follow-up of 51.3 months for the no PMRT group and 65.9 months for the PMRT group (P =.041), 9% (n = 6) of patients from the no PMRT group and 2% (n = 3) from the PMRT group developed LRR (P =.047). There was no difference in local recurrence (1% in no PMRT group vs. 2% in PMRT group; P =.7) and distant recurrence (7% in no PMRT group vs. 3% in PMRT group; P =.16) in patients who received PMRT and no PMRT. Further comparison of the LRR in the no PMRT and PMRT groups in patients with an MS < 18 did not show a significant difference (3% vs. 4%; P =.64). However, among patients with an MS >= 18, no PMRT group had a higher LRR rate compared to the PMRT group (11% vs. 2%; P =.01). In patients with an MS >= 18, the administration of PMRT correlates with statistically significantly better LRR-free survival (HR 0.19; 95% CI 0.05-0.79; P =.02). Conclusions: Our findings imply that when considering PMRT for patients with pT3N0M0, HR-positive, and HER2-negative BC, clinicians can benefit from a combination of pathological risk factors and recurrence prediction models. Patients with MS < 18 experience a comparable rate of recurrence irrespective of PMRT, while those with MS >= 18 have higher rates of LRR and thus should not omit PMRT. (c) 2025 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.clbc.2025.04.012
dc.identifier.issn 1526-8209
dc.identifier.issn 1938-0666
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105005261944
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2025.04.012
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Cig Media Group, Lp en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Clinical Breast Cancer en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Luminal Type en_US
dc.subject Magee Score en_US
dc.subject Postmastectomy Radiotherapy en_US
dc.subject PT3N0M0 Breast Cancer en_US
dc.subject Risk-Adapted Radiotherapy en_US
dc.title Biologically Informed Decision-Making for PMRT in PT3N0M0 Luminal Breast Cancers (Protocol MF22-02): International Multicenter Real-World Data en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department İzmir Institute of Technology en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Soran, Atilla; King, Caleb] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Surg Oncol, Magee Womens Hosp, 300 Halket St Rm 2601, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA; [Gultekin, Melis Bahadir; Yildiz, Ferah] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Med, Radiat Oncol, Ankara, Turkiye; [Venkatesulu, Bhanu Prasad; Barry, Parul Nafees; Vargo, John Austin] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Radiat Oncol, Magee Womens Hosp, Pittsburgh, PA USA; [Bhargava, Rohit] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Pathol, Magee Womens Hosp, Pittsburgh, PA USA; [Karanlik, Hasan] Istanbul Univ, Surg Oncol, Inst Oncol, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Soyder, Aykut] Acbadem Altunizade Hosp, Gen Surg, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Goktepe, Berk; Yeniay, Levent] Ege Univ, Fac Med, Gen Surg, Izmir, Turkiye; [Senol, Kazim] Uludag Univ, Fac Med, Gen Surg, Bursa, Turkiye; [Guzel, Caglar] Gazi Univ, Fac Med, Radiat Oncol, Ankara, Turkiye; [Sen, Ebru] Basaksehir Cam Sakura City Hosp, Gen Surg, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Dag, Ahmet] Mersin Univ, Fac Med, Gen Surg, Mersin, Turkiye; [Trabulus, Didem Can] Bahcesehir Univ, Fac Med, Med Pk Goztepe, Gen Surg, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Coskun, Alper] Uludag Univ, Fac Med, Med Oncol, Bursa, Turkiye; [Veliyeva, Hagigat] Azerbaijan Univ, Fac Med, Gen Surg, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Utkan, Zafer] Kocaeli Univ, Fac Med, Gen Surg, Kocaeli, Turkiye; [Demirors, Berkay] Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training & Res Hosp, Surg, Bursa, Turkiye; [Sezgin, Efe] Izmir Inst Technol, Dept Food Engn, Izmir, Turkiye en_US
gdc.description.issue 7 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.volume 25 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality Q3
gdc.identifier.openalex W4409709057
gdc.identifier.pmid 40379596
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001602615900019
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 0.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.635068E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 2.1091297E-10
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration International
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.0
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.15
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.mendeley 3
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 0
gdc.scopus.citedcount 0
gdc.wos.citedcount 0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9af2b05f-28ac-4003-8abe-a4dfe192da5e

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Name:
1-s2.0-S152682092500103X-main.pdf
Size:
890.86 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article