Applicability of Sediment Transport Capacity Models for Nonsteady State Erosion From Steep Slopes
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Tayfur, Gökmen
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The physics-based sediment transport equations are derived from the assumption that the sediment transport rate can be determined by a dominant variable such as flow discharge, flow velocity, slope, shear stress, stream power, and unit stream power. In modeling of sheet erosion/sediment transport, many models that determine the transport capacity by one of these dominant variables have been developed. The developed models mostly simulate steady-state sheet erosion. Few models that are based on the shear-stress approach attempt to simulate nonsteady state sheet erosion. This study qualitatively investigates the applicability of the transport capacity models that are based on one of the commonly employed dominant variables-unit stream power, stream power, and shear stress-to simulate nonsteady state sediment loads from steep slopes under different rainfall intensities. The test of the calibrated models with observed data sets shows that the unit stream power model gives better simulation of sediment loads from mild slopes. The stream power and the shear stress models, on the other hand, simulate sediment loads from steep slopes more satisfactorily. The exponent (ki) in the sediment transport capacity formula is found to be 1.2, 1.9, and 1.6 for the stream power model, the shear stress model, and the unit stream power model, respectively.
Description
Keywords
Erosion, Sediment transport, Shear stress, Slopes, Shear stress, Erosion, Sediment transport, Slopes
Fields of Science
0208 environmental biotechnology, 0207 environmental engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
Tayfur, G. (2002). Applicability of sediment transport capacity models for nonsteady state erosion from steep slopes. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 7(3), 252-259. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2002)7:3(252)
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
36
Volume
7
Issue
3
Start Page
252
End Page
259
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 36
Scopus : 43
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 29
Google Scholar™


