Properties of Roman Structural Mortars in the Province of Asia (turkey)

dc.contributor.author Tasci, Burcu
dc.contributor.author Boke, Hasan
dc.date.accessioned 2025-02-05T09:48:40Z
dc.date.available 2025-02-05T09:48:40Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.description.abstract In this study, the properties of Roman structural mortars composed of lime and natural aggregates from twentythree archaeological sites in Western Anatolia were determined in order to understand whether there was a common production technology of lime mortars in the Roman Empire by making a comparison between Europe and Western Anatolia. Their basic physical and mechanical properties, raw material compositions, microstructural and hydraulic properties, mineralogical and chemical compositions of their lime binder and fine aggregates were identified by X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive spectroscopy, thermal gravimetric analysis analyses, bulk density, total porosity and compressive strength of mortars. The results indicated that these mortars mortars were produced by combining fat or lean lime with coarse aggregates (quartz, tuff) and predominantly fine pozzolanic rhyolitic and dacitic tuff aggregates. The lime/aggregate ratios of the mortars generally exhibited a range of values between 1:4 and 1.5:1 by weight, which closely paralleled the lime/aggregate ratios in other Roman mortars published in literature. The presence of lime lumps within the mortar matrices, exhibiting a spongy texture, may suggest the use of the hot lime mixing method in the preparation of the mortars. The mortars are hydraulic, possessing compressive strengths comparable to those observed in natural hydraulic lime mortars (NHL2, NHL3.5 and NHL5 types). The results indicate that the production of structural mortars in the province of Asia was similar to that in other regions of the Roman Empire, although the raw materials are similar, small differences in raw material composition could be due to the use of local raw material sources. This may be evidence of a common lime mortar technology that deliberately used pozzolanic aggregates with almost pure lime throughout the Roman Empire. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey [TUBITAK/2211-A] en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This study was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK/2211-A) in the scope of the scholarship. Authors would like to thank the researchers of the Centre for Materials Research of the Izmir Institute of Technology for SEM-EDS, TGA and XRD analyses for the experimental stage of this study. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.ara.2024.100590
dc.identifier.issn 2352-2267
dc.identifier.issn 2352-2275
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85214128718
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ara.2024.100590
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/11147/15294
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier Sci Ltd en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Archaeological Research in Asia
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Pozzolan en_US
dc.subject Lime en_US
dc.subject Tuff en_US
dc.subject Roman Mortars en_US
dc.subject Western Anatolia en_US
dc.title Properties of Roman Structural Mortars in the Province of Asia (turkey) en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.scopusid 57202980037
gdc.author.scopusid 6602391572
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department İzmir Institute of Technology en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Tasci, Burcu] Izmir Katip Celebi Univ, Fac Engn & Architecture, Dept Architecture, TR-35620 Cigli, Izmir, Turkiye; [Boke, Hasan] Izmir Inst Technol, Dept Conservat & Restorat Cultural Heritage, TR-35430 Izmir, Turkiye en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q1
gdc.description.volume 41 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Arts &amp- Humanities Citation Index
gdc.identifier.openalex W4406092599
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001399329300001
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 1.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.6762408E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 2.1223116E-10
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 4.17816096
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.78
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.mendeley 2
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 1
gdc.scopus.citedcount 1
gdc.wos.citedcount 1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 106994b7-c0fa-49ff-b06c-fd490a366454
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9af2b05f-28ac-4025-8abe-a4dfe192da5e

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Name:
1-s2.0-S2352226724000916-main.pdf
Size:
13.58 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article