Identifying Factors Controlling Cellular Uptake of Gold Nanoparticles by Machine Learning
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
There is strong interest to improve the therapeutic potential of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) while ensuring their safe development. The utility of GNPs in medicine requires a molecular-level understanding of how GNPs interact with biological systems. Despite considerable research efforts devoted to monitoring the internalisation of GNPs, there is still insufficient understanding of the factors responsible for the variability in GNP uptake in different cell types. Data-driven models are useful for identifying the sources of this variability. Here, we trained multiple machine learning models on 2077 data points for 193 individual nanoparticles from 59 independent studies to predict cellular uptake level of GNPs and compared different algorithms for their efficacies of prediction. The five ensemble learners (Xgboost, random forest, bootstrap aggregation, gradient boosting, light gradient boosting machine) made the best predictions of GNP uptake, accounting for 80-90% of the variance in the test data. The models identified particle size, zeta potential, GNP concentration and exposure duration as the most important drivers of cellular uptake. We expect this proof-of-concept study will foster the more effective use of accumulated cellular uptake data for GNPs and minimise any methodological bias in individual studies that may lead to under- or over-estimation of cellular internalisation rates.
Description
Keywords
Machine learning, gold nanoparticles, cellular uptake, ICP, medical applications, Dendritic Cells, Particle-Size, Surface, Shape, Prediction, Toxicity, Delivery, Nano, Pharmacology and pharmaceutical sciences, Metal Nanoparticles, Biological Transport, Gold
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
1
Volume
32
Issue
Start Page
66
End Page
73
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 1
Scopus : 4
PubMed : 1
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 6
Google Scholar™


