Computational and Bioinformatics Methods for Microrna Gene Prediction
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Allmer, Jens
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have attracted ever-increasing interest in recent years. Since experimental approaches for determining miRNAs are nontrivial in their application, computational methods for the prediction of miRNAs have gained popularity. Such methods can be grouped into two broad categories (1) performing ab initio predictions of miRNAs from primary sequence alone and (2) additionally employing phylogenetic conservation. Most methods acknowledge the importance of hairpin or stem-loop structures and employ various methods for the prediction of RNA secondary structure. Machine learning has been employed in both categories with classification being the predominant method. In most cases, positive and negative examples are necessary for performing classification. Since it is currently elusive to experimentally determine all possible miRNAs for an organism, true negative examples are hard to come by, and therefore the accuracy assessment of algorithms is hampered. In this chapter, first RNA secondary structure prediction is introduced since it provides a basis for miRNA prediction. This is followed by an assessment of homology and then ab initio miRNA prediction methods.
Description
Keywords
Ab initio prediction, MicroRNAs, Bioinformatics, Secondary structure prediction, Ab initio prediction, MicroRNAs, Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, Secondary structure prediction
Fields of Science
0301 basic medicine, 03 medical and health sciences, 0206 medical engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
Allmer, J. (2014). Computational and bioinformatics methods for microRNA gene prediction. Methods in Molecular Biology, 1107, 157-175. doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-748-8_9
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
11
Volume
1107
Issue
Start Page
157
End Page
175
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 8
Scopus : 18
PubMed : 9
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 24
Google Scholar™


