Laos Behavior of the Two Main Gluten Fractions: Gliadin and Glutenin
Loading...
Files
Date
2017
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd.
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Crude gliadin and glutenin fractions were studied using Large Amplitude Oscillatory measurements. LAOS measurements were carried out at three different frequencies (20, 10, 1 rad/sec) between the strain values of 0.01–200%. The beginning of non-linearity for glutenin occurred at ∼2.5%, while an initial region of strain hardening was observed for gliadin (2.5–10%) at 1 rad/sec frequency and up to 15% at the higher frequencies applied. Lissajous curves showed in the elastic analysis of both fractions glutenin was more elastically dominated since Lissajous curves were narrower, while for gliadin the ellipses were much broader suggesting more fluid-like behavior and each ellipse depended on the magnitude of frequency. Decreasing frequency increased the viscous behavior of both glutenin and gliadin in the non-linear region, but the change in gliadin was much more pronounced. Gliadin molecules only display intramolecular disulfide bonds creating a great deal of mobility whereas for glutenin molecules, which contain both intermolecular and intramolecular disulfide bonds, the strong network structure formed by this molecular arrangement results in very pronounced strain stiffening.
Description
Keywords
Gliadin, Glutenin, LAOS, Non-linear rheological behavior, Glutenin, LAOS, Non-linear rheological behavior, Gliadin
Fields of Science
0404 agricultural biotechnology, 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences
Citation
Yazar, G., Çağlar Duvarcı, Ö., Tavman, Ş., Kokini, J. L. (2017). LAOS behavior of the two main gluten fractions: Gliadin and glutenin. Journal of Cereal Science, 77, 201-210. doi:10.1016/j.jcs.2017.08.014
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
55
Source
Journal of Cereal Science
Volume
77
Issue
Start Page
201
End Page
210
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 3
Scopus : 69
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 47
SCOPUS™ Citations
70
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
63
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Page Views
883
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Downloads
703
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Google Scholar™


