Comparing the Pre- and Post-Specified Peer Models for Key Agreement
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Ustaoğlu, Berkant
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In the pre-specified peer model for key agreement, it is assumed that a party knows the identifier of its intended communicating peer when it commences a protocol run. On the other hand, a party in the post-specified peer model for key agreement does not know the identifier of its communicating peer at the outset, but learns the identifier during the protocol run. In this paper we compare the security assurances provided by the Canetti-Krawczyk security definitions for key agreement in the pre- and post-specified peer models. We give examples of protocols that are secure in one model but insecure in the other. We also enhance the Canetti-Krawczyk security models and definitions to encompass a class of protocols that are executable and secure in both the pre- and post-specified peer models. © 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Description
13th Australasian Conference on Information Security and Privacy, ACISP 2008; Wollongong, NSW; Australia; 7 July 2008 through 9 July 2008
Keywords
Network security, Key agreement protocols, Peer model, Security assurance, Security definitions, Security model, Security model, Security definitions, Security assurance, Network security, Key agreement protocols, Peer model
Fields of Science
0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 0102 computer and information sciences, 02 engineering and technology, 01 natural sciences
Citation
Menezes, A., and Ustaoğlu, B. (2008). Comparing the pre- and post-specified peer models for key agreement. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5107 LNCS, 53-68. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70500-0_5
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
26
Volume
5107 LNCS
Issue
Start Page
53
End Page
68
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 21
Scopus : 28
Web of Science™ Citations
19
checked on Apr 30, 2026
Page Views
692
checked on Apr 30, 2026
Downloads
504
checked on Apr 30, 2026
Google Scholar™


