Modelling Trip Distribution With Fuzzy and Genetic Fuzzy Systems
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Çelik, Hüseyin Murat
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This paper explores the potential capabilities of fuzzy and genetic fuzzy system approaches in urban trip distribution modelling with some new features. First, a simple fuzzy rule-based system (FRBS) and a novel genetic fuzzy rule-based system [GFRBS: a fuzzy system improved by a knowledge base learning process with genetic algorithms (GAs)] are designed to model intra-city passenger flows for Istanbul. Subsequently, their accuracy, applicability and generalizability characteristics are evaluated against the well-known gravity- and neural network (NN)-based trip distribution models. The overall results show that: traditional doubly constrained gravity models are still simple and efficient; NNs may not show expected performance when they are forced to satisfy trip constraints; simply-designed FRBSs, learning from observations and expertise, are both efficient and interpretable even if the data are large and noisy; and use of GAs in fuzzy rule-based learning considerably increases modelling performance, although it brings additional computation cost.
Description
Keywords
Spatial interaction models, Fuzzy logic, Genetic algorithms, Trip distribution, Learning algorithms, Neural networks, Fuzzy logic, Trip distribution, Spatial interaction models, Genetic algorithms, Learning algorithms, Neural networks
Fields of Science
0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
Kompil, M., and Çelik, H.M. (2013). Modelling trip distribution with fuzzy and genetic fuzzy systems. Transportation Planning and Technology, 36(2), 170-200. doi:10.1080/03081060.2013.770946
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
12
Volume
36
Issue
2
Start Page
170
End Page
200
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 2
Scopus : 10
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 16
SCOPUS™ Citations
10
checked on Apr 29, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
9
checked on Apr 29, 2026
Page Views
736
checked on Apr 29, 2026
Downloads
475
checked on Apr 29, 2026
Google Scholar™



