Artificial Neural Network (ann) Prediction of Compressive Strength of Vartm Processed Polymer Composites
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
A three layer feed forward artificial neural network (ANN) model having three input neurons, one output neuron and two hidden neurons was developed to predict the ply-lay up compressive strength of VARTM processed E-glass/ polyester composites. The composites were manufactured using fabric preforms consolidated with 0, 3 and 6 wt.% of thermoplastic binder. The learning of ANN was accomplished by a backpropagation algorithm. A good agreement between the measured and the predicted values was obtained. Testing of the model was done within low average error levels of 3.28%. Furthermore, the predictions of ANN model were compared with those obtained from a multi-linear regression (MLR) model. It was found that ANN model has better predictions than MLR model for the experimental data. Also, the ANN model was subjected to a sensitivity analysis to obtain its response. As a result, the ANN model was found to have an ability to yield a desired level of ply-lay up compressive strength values for the composites processed with the addition of the thermoplastic binder.
Description
Keywords
Artificial neural network (ANN), Compressive strength, Multi-linear regression (MLR), Polymer composites, Preforming binder, Neural networks, Artificial neural network (ANN), Polymer composites, Preforming binder, Compressive strength, Multi-linear regression (MLR), Neural networks
Fields of Science
0203 mechanical engineering, 02 engineering and technology, 0210 nano-technology
Citation
Seyhan, A. T., Tayfur, G., Karakurt, M., and Tanoǧlu, M. (2005). Artificial neural network (ANN) prediction of compressive strength of VARTM processed polymer composites. Computational Materials Science, 34(1), 99-105. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2004.11.001
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
52
Volume
34
Issue
1
Start Page
99
End Page
105
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 22
Scopus : 63
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 74
Google Scholar™


