Techno-Functional and in Vitro Digestibility Properties of Gluten-Free Cookies Made From Raw, Pre-Cooked, and Germinated Chickpea Flours
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Chickpea flour, which is produced in various forms, has high protein and fiber content; therefore, it can be a good ingredient for gluten-free cookies. The objective of this study was to investigate and compare the properties of cookies formulated using raw (RCF), cooked (CCF), and germinated (GCF) chickpea flours. The techno-functional properties of these flours were determined, and scanning electron microscope images and mid-infrared spectra were obtained. The rheological properties of cookie doughs were measured along with their mid-infrared spectra. Baked cookies were analyzed for their technological properties as well as their in vitro digestion properties. Sensory analysis was also performed for all the cookies. The most significant difference among the flours was observed in their water retention capacity, and CCF had 119.7% higher water retention capacity compared to RCF. The dough made with CCF had quite different rheological properties from the others. The cookies baked with GCF had the highest baking loss and spread ratio. The CCF-containing cookies had the hardest structure. The cookies made from RCF had a higher resistant starch content followed by the cookies with GCF. All the cookies had similar scores in all aspects tested in the sensory analysis. The use of three different forms of chickpea flour in cookie formulations resulted in products with very different properties; however, their overall acceptability levels were close.
Description
Keywords
Chickpea flour, Gluten-free cookie, Digestibility, digestibility, Chemical technology, gluten-free, cookie, TP1-1185, chickpea flour; gluten-free; cookie; digestibility, Article, chickpea flour
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
11
Source
Volume
12
Issue
15
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 9
Scopus : 17
PubMed : 4
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 41
SCOPUS™ Citations
17
checked on Apr 28, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
16
checked on Apr 28, 2026
Page Views
365
checked on Apr 28, 2026
Downloads
174
checked on Apr 28, 2026
Google Scholar™


