Quantitative Detection of Low Energy Impact Damage in a Sandwich Composite Wing
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This work describes damage detection in a foam core composite wing (1320 mm × 152.4 mm × 13.4 mm) following a series of low energy impacts. Thirteen impacts (6-8 J deposited energy) were applied at adjacent locations approximately 1/4 of the way out from the wing center. Following every one or two impacts, the wing was tested using static tip deflection and dynamic vibrational excitation. Static and dynamic strains were measured using eight fiber Bragg grating sensors. Dynamic acceleration was also monitored using three conventional accelerometers. The estimated bicoherence was used to detect the presence of damage-induced non-linearity in time-series data recorded from each sensor. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for each sensor based on 15 or more dynamic measurements made for each damage case. The ROC curves provide a quantitative, statistical approach to evaluating the damage detection capabilities of the various sensors.
Description
1st ASME Smart Materials, Adaptive Structurres and Intelligent Systems Symposium on Structural Health Monitoring, Ellicott City, MD, October 28-30. 2008
Keywords
Damage detection, Bicoherence, Fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs), Sandwich composite, ROC curves, Sandwich composite, Fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs), Bicoherence, Damage detection, ROC curves
Fields of Science
0103 physical sciences, 01 natural sciences
Citation
Seaver, M., Aktaş, E., and Trickey, S. T. (2010). Quantitative detection of low energy impact damage in a sandwich composite wing. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 21(3), 297-308. doi:10.1177/1045389X09347020
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
9
Volume
21
Issue
3
Start Page
297
End Page
308
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 8
Scopus : 14
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 9
Google Scholar™


