Comparison of Intelligent Parking Guidance System and Conventional System With Regard To Capacity Utilisation
Loading...
Date
2021
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The capacity utilisation of car parks is an important issue because of space deficiency for infrastructure improvement in city centres. Intelligent Parking Guidance Systems (IPGSs) provide a solution to such shortages by managing car park capacity. In this study, an IPGS model is proposed concerning the occupancy condition of three surface car parks, and the proposed model is compared with the conventional system (CS) where drivers tend to prefer the closest parking utility. A multi-agent-based simulation program investigates five scenarios and the results compared regarding the occupancy ratio, wasted Value of Time (VoT), and emission of harmful gases. The simulation results illustrate that the proposed IPGS model manages to equilibrate the capacity utilisation of car parks and the parking search period compared with the CS model. Analysis results show that emissions for CS of CO2, CO, HC, and NOx are 398.71, 19.90, 3.29, and 21.14 g/s/veh, respectively. This is attributed to the extra search period in the CS models. Besides, the cost of this extra searching period in CS is estimated in terms of the value of time for Turkey, Germany, U.K., and France as 0.49, 0.93, 1.42, and 1.42 euro/veh respectively. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd
Description
Keywords
Capacity utilization of car parks, Car park management, Carbon emission, Intelligent parking guidance system, Value of time
Fields of Science
0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
15
Source
Sustainable Cities and Society
Volume
74
Issue
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 16
Scopus : 20
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 44
SCOPUS™ Citations
20
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
15
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Page Views
400
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Downloads
510
checked on Apr 27, 2026
Google Scholar™




