Electrostatic Charge on Spray Droplets of Aqueous Surfactant Solutions
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Electrostatic charges on individual spray droplets were measured using a refined form of the Millikan oil drop method. The measurement system consisted of three main sections; a droplet generation cell, a settling column and a charge measurement chamber. The trajectories required for calculation of charge were determined using a high-speed motion analyzer coupled to a long-focal-length microscope. Charges on droplets were manipulated by the addition of surface-active agents into the spray solution. Droplet charge was a function of the type and concentration of the surfactant added. For ionic surfactants, it showed a maximum at low surfactant concentrations, decreased with further surfactant addition and was constant after the CMC. The charge on cationic surfactants was always more than that observed with the anionic surfactants. Nonionic surfactants displayed a steady increase in droplet charge with increasing concentration. The charges were lower compared to the ionic surfactants. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.
Electrostatic charges on individual spray droplets were measured using a refined form of the Millikan oil drop method. The measurement system consisted of three main sections; a droplet generation cell, a settling column and a charge measurement chamber. The trajectories required for calculation of charge were determined using a high-speed motion analyzer coupled to a long-focal-length microscope. Charges on droplets were manipulated by the addition of surface-active agents into the spray solution. Droplet charge was a function of the type and concentration of the surfactant added. For ionic surfactants, it showed a maximum at low surfactant concentrations, decreased with further surfactant addition and was constant after the CMC. The charge on cationic surfactants was always more than that observed with the anionic surfactants. Nonionic surfactants displayed a steady increase in droplet charge with increasing concentration. The charges were lower compared to the ionic surfactants.
Description
Keywords
Surface active agents, Composition effects, Drop formation, Electric charge, Negative ions, Positive ions, Milikan oil drop method, Composition effects, Positive ions, Surface active agents, Drop formation, Milikan oil drop method, Electric charge, Negative ions
Fields of Science
01 natural sciences, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Citation
Polat, M., Polat, H., and Chander, S. (2000). Electrostatic charge on spray droplets of aqueous surfactant solutions. Journal of Aerosol Science, 31(5), 551-562. doi:10.1016/S0021-8502(99)00542-X
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
13
Volume
31
Issue
5
Start Page
551
End Page
562
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 12
Scopus : 23
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 16
Google Scholar™


