Electrostatic Charge on Spray Droplets of Aqueous Surfactant Solutions

Loading...

Date

Authors

Polat, Mehmet
Polat, Hürriyet

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Open Access Color

BRONZE

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Top 10%
Popularity
Average

relationships.isProjectOf

relationships.isJournalIssueOf

Abstract

Electrostatic charges on individual spray droplets were measured using a refined form of the Millikan oil drop method. The measurement system consisted of three main sections; a droplet generation cell, a settling column and a charge measurement chamber. The trajectories required for calculation of charge were determined using a high-speed motion analyzer coupled to a long-focal-length microscope. Charges on droplets were manipulated by the addition of surface-active agents into the spray solution. Droplet charge was a function of the type and concentration of the surfactant added. For ionic surfactants, it showed a maximum at low surfactant concentrations, decreased with further surfactant addition and was constant after the CMC. The charge on cationic surfactants was always more than that observed with the anionic surfactants. Nonionic surfactants displayed a steady increase in droplet charge with increasing concentration. The charges were lower compared to the ionic surfactants. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. Electrostatic charges on individual spray droplets were measured using a refined form of the Millikan oil drop method. The measurement system consisted of three main sections; a droplet generation cell, a settling column and a charge measurement chamber. The trajectories required for calculation of charge were determined using a high-speed motion analyzer coupled to a long-focal-length microscope. Charges on droplets were manipulated by the addition of surface-active agents into the spray solution. Droplet charge was a function of the type and concentration of the surfactant added. For ionic surfactants, it showed a maximum at low surfactant concentrations, decreased with further surfactant addition and was constant after the CMC. The charge on cationic surfactants was always more than that observed with the anionic surfactants. Nonionic surfactants displayed a steady increase in droplet charge with increasing concentration. The charges were lower compared to the ionic surfactants.

Description

Keywords

Surface active agents, Composition effects, Drop formation, Electric charge, Negative ions, Positive ions, Milikan oil drop method, Composition effects, Positive ions, Surface active agents, Drop formation, Milikan oil drop method, Electric charge, Negative ions

Fields of Science

01 natural sciences, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences

Citation

Polat, M., Polat, H., and Chander, S. (2000). Electrostatic charge on spray droplets of aqueous surfactant solutions. Journal of Aerosol Science, 31(5), 551-562. doi:10.1016/S0021-8502(99)00542-X

WoS Q

Scopus Q

OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
13

Volume

31

Issue

5

Start Page

551

End Page

562
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 12

Scopus : 23

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 16

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
0.7615364

Sustainable Development Goals