Effect of Various Treatment and Glazing (coating) Techniques on the Roughness and Wettability of Ceramic Dental Restorative Surfaces

dc.contributor.author Aksoy, Gökhan
dc.contributor.author Polat, Hürriyet
dc.contributor.author Polat, Mehmet
dc.contributor.author Çoşkun, G.
dc.coverage.doi 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.09.016
dc.date.accessioned 2016-08-16T11:35:13Z
dc.date.available 2016-08-16T11:35:13Z
dc.date.issued 2006
dc.description.abstract Surface treatment procedures such as grinding and polishing are needed to provide the ceramic dental restorative materials with proper fitting and occlusion. The treated surfaces are customarily glazed to improve the strength and smoothness. Though smoothness and wetting of the dental surfaces are important to minimize bacterial plaque retention, influence of the surface treatment and glazing procedures on the final surface roughness and its correlation to wettability are overlooked. In this work, effect of various treatment (diamond fraising, stoning, sanding and aluminum oxide and rubber polishing) and glazing (auto and overglazing) techniques on the final roughness and the resulting wettability of dental ceramic surfaces were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations and atomic force microscopy (AFM) scans, 75 scans per sample. The surfaces were characterized and assigned an average roughness measure, Ra. The wettability of the same surfaces was evaluated using micro-contact angle measurements (25 micro-bubbles placed on a grid on each surface) to correlate the final surface roughness and wettability. The results show that overglazing prevails over surface irregularities from different treatment procedures and provides homegeneously smooth surfaces with mean Ra < 10 nm. It also produces uniformly wetted surfaces with low contact angles around 20°. The autoglazed surfaces are less smooth (mean Ra around 50 nm) and displays sporadic topographic irregularities. They display larger and less uniform contact angles ranging between 35° and 50°. The results suggest that overglazing should be preferred after surface treatment to obtain a smooth and well-wetted dental ceramic surface. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Aksoy, G., Polat, H., Polat, M., and Çoşkun, G. (2006). Effect of various treatment and glazing (coating) techniques on the roughness and wettability of ceramic dental restorative surfaces. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 53(2), 254-259. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.09.016 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.09.016 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0927-7765
dc.identifier.issn 0927-7765
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-33751216447
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.09.016
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11147/2122
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier Ltd. en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Contact angle en_US
dc.subject Glazing; Roughness en_US
dc.subject Surface treatment en_US
dc.subject Wettability en_US
dc.subject Wetting en_US
dc.subject Dental materials en_US
dc.title Effect of Various Treatment and Glazing (coating) Techniques on the Roughness and Wettability of Ceramic Dental Restorative Surfaces en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.institutional Polat, Hürriyet
gdc.author.institutional Polat, Mehmet
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C4
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department İzmir Institute of Technology. Chemistry en_US
gdc.description.department İzmir Institute of Technology. Chemical Engineering en_US
gdc.description.endpage 259 en_US
gdc.description.issue 2 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q1
gdc.description.startpage 254 en_US
gdc.description.volume 53 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality Q1
gdc.identifier.openalex W2035577127
gdc.identifier.pmid 17097279
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000243231300018
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed
gdc.oaire.accesstype BRONZE
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 3.0
gdc.oaire.influence 5.686183E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen true
gdc.oaire.keywords Ceramics
gdc.oaire.keywords Dental materials
gdc.oaire.keywords Crowns
gdc.oaire.keywords Surface Properties
gdc.oaire.keywords Surface treatment
gdc.oaire.keywords Wetting
gdc.oaire.keywords Microscopy, Atomic Force
gdc.oaire.keywords Dental Porcelain
gdc.oaire.keywords Dental Polishing
gdc.oaire.keywords Coated Materials, Biocompatible
gdc.oaire.keywords Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
gdc.oaire.keywords Wettability
gdc.oaire.keywords Glazing; Roughness
gdc.oaire.keywords Aluminum Silicates
gdc.oaire.keywords Diamond
gdc.oaire.keywords Contact angle
gdc.oaire.popularity 1.8774315E-8
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 03 medical and health sciences
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0302 clinical medicine
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 1.14553373
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.72
gdc.opencitations.count 47
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 37
gdc.plumx.facebookshareslikecount 3
gdc.plumx.mendeley 74
gdc.plumx.pubmedcites 10
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 62
gdc.scopus.citedcount 62
gdc.wos.citedcount 57
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 969003b0-8913-466f-b6ea-f950048cb14f
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9af2b05f-28ac-4011-8abe-a4dfe192da5e

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Name:
2122.pdf
Size:
1012.83 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Makale

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: