Pitch-Frequency Histogram-Based Music Information Retrieval for Turkish Music
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Gedik, Ali Cenk
Bozkurt, Barış
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
2
OpenAIRE Views
2
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This study reviews the use of pitch histograms in music information retrieval studies for western and non-western music. The problems in applying the pitch-class histogram-based methods developed for western music to non-western music and specifically to Turkish music are discussed in detail. The main problems are the assumptions used to reduce the dimension of the pitch histogram space, such as, mapping to a low and fixed dimensional pitch-class space, the hard-coded use of western music theory, the use of the standard diapason (A4=440 Hz), analysis based on tonality and tempered tuning. We argue that it is more appropriate to use higher dimensional pitch-frequency histograms without such assumptions for Turkish music. We show in two applications, automatic tonic detection and makam recognition, that high dimensional pitch-frequency histogram representations can be successfully used in Music Information Retrieval (MIR) applications without such pre-assumptions, using the data-driven models. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Electronic musical instruments, Automatic makam recognition, Automatic tonic detection, Music information retrieval, Turkish music, Automatic makam recognition, Music information retrieval, Automatic tonic detection, Turkish music, Electronic musical instruments
Fields of Science
05 social sciences, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, 06 humanities and the arts, 0604 arts
Citation
Gedik, A. C., and Bozkurt, B. (2010). Pitch-frequency histogram-based music information retrieval for Turkish music. Signal Processing, 90(4), 1049-1063. doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2009.06.017
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
43
Source
Volume
90
Issue
4
Start Page
1049
End Page
1063
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 44
Scopus : 64
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 53
Google Scholar™


