Valorization of Olive Tree Pruning Waste for Potential Utilization in Lithium Recovery From Aqueous Solutions
| dc.contributor.author | Nampeera, Jackline | |
| dc.contributor.author | Recepoğlu, Yaşar Kemal | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yüksel, Aslı | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-03T12:08:20Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-08-03T12:08:20Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.description | Article | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Olive tree pruning waste, mainly composed of olive branches, was converted into a value-added and sustainable product capable of lithium as a biosorbent through alkali treatment and phosphorylation reaction. Characterization studies were performed by SEM–EDX, XPS, FTIR, and TGA. Factors affecting biosorption mechanism, i.e., sorbent dosage, pH, initial Li+ concentration and temperature, and competitive ions’ presence, were investigated the synthesized functionalized olive branches (FOB). A commercial lithium selective resin, Lewatit TP 260, was also compared with FOB in batch and column studies. The Freundlich model fits adsorption isotherms better than the Langmuir model, with a maximum adsorption capacity of 6.7 mg/g at 30 °C and pH 7–8. Kinetic studies proved fast kinetics and equilibrium were attained in 6 min, while thermodynamic studies showed an exothermic (Δ Ho= - 17.52 kJ/ mol) , spontaneous reaction Δ Go< 0 at all temperatures), and increased randomness Δ So= + 24.27 J/ mol. K) at the interaction interface. Column studies revealed that although Lewatit TP 260 resin showed higher sorption capacity, its desorption efficiency (50.42%) was lower than that of FOB (99.9%), and the degree of column utilization of FOB (56.81%) was better than Lewatit TP 260 resin’s (16.0%). The findings were encouraging in the successful synthesis of a promising biosorbent from an abundant waste in Turkey for use in sustainable lithium recovery from aqueous sources. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.] | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s13399-022-02647-2 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2190-6815 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2190-6815 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2190-6823 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85127727542 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02647-2 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11147/12254 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Biosorbent | en_US |
| dc.subject | Lithium | en_US |
| dc.subject | Olive pruning waste | en_US |
| dc.subject | Phosphorylation | en_US |
| dc.title | Valorization of Olive Tree Pruning Waste for Potential Utilization in Lithium Recovery From Aqueous Solutions | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| gdc.author.id | 0000-0001-8160-3740 | |
| gdc.author.id | 0000-0001-6646-0358 | |
| gdc.author.id | 0000-0002-9273-2078 | |
| gdc.author.id | 0000-0001-8160-3740 | en_US |
| gdc.author.id | 0000-0001-6646-0358 | en_US |
| gdc.author.id | 0000-0002-9273-2078 | en_US |
| gdc.author.institutional | Nampeera, Jackline | |
| gdc.author.institutional | Recepoğlu, Yaşar Kemal | |
| gdc.author.institutional | Yüksel, Aslı | |
| gdc.bip.impulseclass | C4 | |
| gdc.bip.influenceclass | C5 | |
| gdc.bip.popularityclass | C5 | |
| gdc.coar.access | embargoed access | |
| gdc.coar.type | text::journal::journal article | |
| gdc.collaboration.industrial | false | |
| gdc.contributor.affiliation | 01. Izmir Institute of Technology | en_US |
| gdc.contributor.affiliation | 01. Izmir Institute of Technology | en_US |
| gdc.contributor.affiliation | 01. Izmir Institute of Technology | en_US |
| gdc.description.department | İzmir Institute of Technology. Chemical Engineering | en_US |
| gdc.description.endpage | 4987 | |
| gdc.description.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| gdc.description.scopusquality | Q2 | |
| gdc.description.startpage | 4975 | |
| gdc.description.volume | 14 | |
| gdc.description.wosquality | Q2 | |
| gdc.identifier.openalex | W4226214968 | |
| gdc.identifier.wos | WOS:000779508500003 | |
| gdc.index.type | WoS | |
| gdc.index.type | Scopus | |
| gdc.oaire.diamondjournal | false | |
| gdc.oaire.impulse | 8.0 | |
| gdc.oaire.influence | 2.8075593E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.isgreen | true | |
| gdc.oaire.popularity | 4.1092902E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.publicfunded | false | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 02 engineering and technology | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0210 nano-technology | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 01 natural sciences | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0104 chemical sciences | |
| gdc.openalex.collaboration | National | |
| gdc.openalex.fwci | 1.73108994 | |
| gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile | 0.78 | |
| gdc.openalex.toppercent | TOP 1% | |
| gdc.opencitations.count | 6 | |
| gdc.plumx.crossrefcites | 2 | |
| gdc.plumx.mendeley | 17 | |
| gdc.plumx.scopuscites | 12 | |
| gdc.scopus.citedcount | 11 | |
| gdc.wos.citedcount | 13 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 82ea3c67-5575-4df2-a8b9-5d6f7b2203c8 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 9af2b05f-28ac-4003-8abe-a4dfe192da5e |
