Quantitative Determination of Phenolic Compounds in Propolis Samples From the Black Sea Region (türkiye) Based on Hptlc Images Using Partial Least Squares and Genetic Inverse Least Squares Methods

dc.contributor.author Güzelmeriç, Etil
dc.contributor.author Özdemir, Durmuş
dc.contributor.author Şen, Nisa Beril
dc.contributor.author Çelik, Cansel
dc.contributor.author Yeşilada, Erdem
dc.date.accessioned 2023-07-27T19:49:56Z
dc.date.available 2023-07-27T19:49:56Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.description.abstract The complex chemical composition of propolis is related to the plant source to be used by honeybees. Propolis type is defined based on the plant source with the highest proportion in its composition, which is determined by chromatographic techniques as high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC). In addition to marker component identification to specify the propolis type, quantification of its proportion is also significant for prediction and reproducible pharmacological activity. One drawback for propolis marker component quantita-tion is that during the chromatographical analysis, not the main but the other plant sources with less proportion may cause interferences during the chemical analysis. In this study, the amounts of marker components were compared with the reference analysis data obtained by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and from HPTLC images using Partial Least Squares (PLS) and Genetic Inverse Least Squares (GILS) regression methods. Firstly, HPTLC images of propolis samples were processed by an image algorithm (developed in MATLAB) where the bands of each standard and the samples were cut same dimensional pieces as 351 x 26 pixels in height and width, respectively. Simultaneously, reference analysis of the marker components in propolis samples was performed with a validated HPLC method. Consequently, the reference values obtained from HPLC versus PLS, and GILS predicted values of the eight compounds based on the digitized HPTLC images of the chromatograms were found to be matched successfully. The results of the multivariate calibration models demonstrated that HPTLC images could be used quantitatively for quality control of propolis used as a food supplement. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This study was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Tuerkiye (TUEBITAK), Project No: 118S645. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.jpba.2023.115338
dc.identifier.issn 0731-7085
dc.identifier.issn 1873-264X
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85151431910
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2023.115338
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/11147/13588
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Propolis en_US
dc.subject HPLC en_US
dc.subject HPTLC en_US
dc.subject Multivariate calibration en_US
dc.subject Partial least squares (PLS) en_US
dc.subject Genetic inverse least squares (GILS) en_US
dc.subject Fingerprints en_US
dc.subject Calibration en_US
dc.title Quantitative Determination of Phenolic Compounds in Propolis Samples From the Black Sea Region (türkiye) Based on Hptlc Images Using Partial Least Squares and Genetic Inverse Least Squares Methods en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id 0000-0003-3297-8217
gdc.author.id 0000-0003-3297-8217 en_US
gdc.author.institutional Özdemir, Durmuş
gdc.author.scopusid 56486010700
gdc.author.scopusid 57212093641
gdc.author.scopusid 57224165674
gdc.author.scopusid 57221844447
gdc.author.scopusid 7007088981
gdc.bip.impulseclass C4
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department İzmir Institute of Technology. Chemistry en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.volume 229 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality Q2
gdc.identifier.openalex W4324030881
gdc.identifier.pmid 36965375
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000962951800001
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 6.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.8628906E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.keywords Black Sea
gdc.oaire.keywords Phenols
gdc.oaire.keywords Ascomycota
gdc.oaire.keywords Animals
gdc.oaire.keywords Chromatography, Thin Layer
gdc.oaire.keywords Least-Squares Analysis
gdc.oaire.keywords Propolis
gdc.oaire.keywords Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
gdc.oaire.popularity 7.265607E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 2.55663152
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.87
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 1%
gdc.opencitations.count 5
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 6
gdc.plumx.mendeley 14
gdc.plumx.pubmedcites 3
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 8
gdc.scopus.citedcount 8
gdc.wos.citedcount 9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 451421f9-0bfe-4cc9-9c73-6252ce7a8a27
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9af2b05f-28ac-4011-8abe-a4dfe192da5e

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Name:
1-s2.0-S0731708523001073-main.pdf
Size:
6.65 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format