Weighing Diverse Theoretical Models on Turkish Maqam Music Against Pitch Measurements: a Comparison of Peaks Automatically Derived From Frequency Histograms With Proposed Scale Tones
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Since the early 20th century, various theories have been advanced in order to mathematically explain and notate modes of Traditional Turkish music known as maqams. In this article, maqam scales according to various theoretical models based on different tunings are compared with pitch measurements obtained from select recordings of master Turkish performers in order to study their level of match with analysed data. Chosen recordings are subjected to a fully computerized sequence of signal processing algorithms for the automatic determination of the set of relative pitches for each maqam scale: f0 estimation, histogram computation, tonic detection + histogram alignment, and peak picking. For nine well-recognized maqams, automatically derived relative pitches are compared with scale tones defined by theoretical models using quantitative distance measures. We analyse and interpret histogram peaks based on these measures to find the theoretical models most conforming with all the recordings, and hence, with the quotidian performance trends influenced by them.
Description
Keywords
Turkish maqam music, Turkish music, Signal processing, Automatic pitch analysis, Automatic tonic detection, Signal processing, Automatic tonic detection, Automatic pitch analysis, Turkish music, Turkish maqam music
Fields of Science
05 social sciences, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Citation
Bozkurt, B., Yarman, O., Karaosmanoğlu, M. K. and Akkoç, C. (2009). Weighing Diverse Theoretical Models on Turkish Maqam Music Against Pitch Measurements:A Comparison of Peaks Automatically Derived from Frequency Histograms with Proposed ScaleTones. Journal of New Music Research, 38(1), 45-70. doi:10.1080/09298210903147673
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
16
Volume
38
Issue
1
Start Page
45
End Page
70
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 13
Scopus : 20
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 24
SCOPUS™ Citations
20
checked on Apr 30, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
13
checked on Apr 30, 2026
Page Views
1219
checked on Apr 30, 2026
Downloads
790
checked on Apr 30, 2026
Google Scholar™


