Conflicts Over Locally Unwanted Land Uses (lulus): Reasons and Solutions for Case Studies in Izmir (turkey)
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Kaya Erol, Nursen
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Land use planning affects many different and usually conflicting interests. While every land use planning decision has a potential of creating conflicts, Locally Unwanted Land Uses (LULUs) are the most conflict facing subjects in urban land use planning processes. This paper aims to answer the question “what are the reasons and solutions for conflicts in the planning processes of LULUs”. This paper is based on a research examining LULU cases in İzmir, Turkey including solid waste facilities, fisheries and quarries to find out the reasons and the solutions for LULU conflicts. The research findings suggest that the conflicts stem not only from negative effects of LULUs on environment and community but also from procedural deficiencies such as lack of knowledge and lack of trust. The findings also call for planning processes with more consideration of local level and public participation seeking for consensus. Meanwhile, the conclusions underline the limitations for the success of participatory processes in which conflicts are resolved with attempts including symbolic benefits rather than considering exact interests of local people. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd
Description
Keywords
Conflict resolution, Fisheries, Land use planning, Locally Unwanted Land Uses, Solid waste facilities, Quarries, Solid waste facilities, Fisheries, Quarries, Locally Unwanted Land Uses, Land use planning, Conflict resolution
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology, 01 natural sciences, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Citation
Atay Kaya, İ., and Kaya Erol, N. (2016). Conflicts over Locally Unwanted Land Uses (LULUs): Reasons and solutions for case studies in Izmir (Turkey). Land Use Policy, 58, 83-94. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.07.011
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
36
Source
Volume
58
Issue
Start Page
83
End Page
94
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 10
Scopus : 41
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 66
Google Scholar™


