A Comparative Performance Evaluation of Various Approaches for Liver Segmentation From Spir Images

dc.contributor.author Göçeri, Evgin
dc.contributor.author Ünlü, Mehmet Zübeyir
dc.contributor.author Dicle, Oğuz
dc.coverage.doi 10.3906/elk-1304-36
dc.date.accessioned 2017-05-16T08:35:03Z
dc.date.available 2017-05-16T08:35:03Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.description.abstract Developing a robust method for liver segmentation from magnetic resonance images is a challenging task because of the similar intensity values between adjacent organs, the geometrically complex liver structure, and injection of contrast media. Most importantly, a high anatomical variability of a healthy or diseased liver is a major challenge in defining the exact boundaries of the liver. Several artifacts of pulsation, motion, and partial volume effects are also among the variety of factors that make automatic liver segmentation difficult. In this paper, we present an overview of liver segmentation methods in magnetic resonance images and show comparative results of seven different pseudo-3D liver segmentation approaches chosen from deterministic (K-means-based), probabilistic (Gaussian model-based), supervised neural network (multilayer perceptron-based), and deformable model-based (level set) segmentation methods. The results of quantitative and qualitative analyses using sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy metrics show that the multilayer perceptron-based approach and a level set-based approach, both of which use distance regularization terms and signed pressure force function, are the most successful methods for liver segmentation from spectral presaturation inversion recovery (SPIR) images. However, the multilayer perceptron-based segmentation method has a higher computational cost. The automatic method using the distance regularized level set evolution with signed pressure force function avoids the sensitivity of a user-defined initial contour for each slice, gives the most efficient results for liver segmentation after the preprocessing steps, and also requires less computational time. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Göçeri, E., Ünlü, M. Z., and Dicle, O. (2015). A comparative performance evaluation of various approaches for liver segmentation from SPIR images. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 23(3), 741-768. doi:10.3906/elk-1304-36 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.3906/elk-1304-36
dc.identifier.doi 10.3906/elk-1304-36 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1300-0632
dc.identifier.issn 1303-6203
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-84928652367
dc.identifier.uri http://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1304-36
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/11147/5519
dc.identifier.uri https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/168945
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Türkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Gaussian mixture model en_US
dc.subject K-means en_US
dc.subject Liver segmentation en_US
dc.subject Magnetic resonance image en_US
dc.subject Multilayer perceptron en_US
dc.subject Image segmentation en_US
dc.title A Comparative Performance Evaluation of Various Approaches for Liver Segmentation From Spir Images en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.institutional Göçeri, Evgin
gdc.author.institutional Ünlü, Mehmet Zübeyir
gdc.author.yokid 42462
gdc.bip.impulseclass C4
gdc.bip.influenceclass C4
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department İzmir Institute of Technology. Electrical and Electronics Engineering en_US
gdc.description.endpage 768 en_US
gdc.description.issue 3 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.startpage 741 en_US
gdc.description.volume 23 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality Q3
gdc.identifier.openalex W1986529576
gdc.identifier.trdizinid 168945
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000352476800010
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type TR-Dizin
gdc.oaire.accesstype GOLD
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 5.0
gdc.oaire.influence 4.8620987E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen true
gdc.oaire.keywords Magnetic resonance image
gdc.oaire.keywords Image segmentation
gdc.oaire.keywords Gaussian mixture model
gdc.oaire.keywords Liver segmentation
gdc.oaire.keywords Multilayer perceptron
gdc.oaire.keywords K-means
gdc.oaire.popularity 1.7625979E-8
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 03 medical and health sciences
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0302 clinical medicine
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 02 engineering and technology
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 1.46115637
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.87
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 35
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 17
gdc.plumx.mendeley 10
gdc.plumx.newscount 1
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 47
gdc.scopus.citedcount 47
gdc.wos.citedcount 45
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 49c42a89-9777-48a3-ad7b-b410255def23
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9af2b05f-28ac-4018-8abe-a4dfe192da5e

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Name:
5519.pdf
Size:
4.97 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Makale

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: