Inhibition of Catechol-O (comt) by Some Plant-Derived Alkaloids and Phenolics
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Bayraktar, Oğuz
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In this study, as an alternative to the medicines, natural compounds extracted from plant species (Peganum harmala, Cistus parviflorus and Vitex agnus-cactus) were investigated in order to inhibit the catechol-O-metyhltranferase (COMT) activity. In fluorometric enzyme assay, S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) and aesculetin (ES) were used as methyl donor and acceptor substrates, respectively. Their Km values were determined as 3.5 ± 0.3 μM and 6.4 ± 0.4 μM in absence of inhibitor. Inhibition performances of the plant-derived polyphenolics and alkaloids were determined. Inhibitory effect of alkaloids extracted from P. harmala seeds was found the highest among the plant extracts; however, it was lower than that of 3,5-DNC. In case of inhibition mechanism, mixed type inhibition was observed for alkaloid extract whereas uncompetitive inhibition was observed for 3,5-DNC. In case of polyphenolic extracts obtained from C. parviflorus and V. agnus-cactus leaves, mechanism were also explained as mixed type inhibition and their αKi values were calculated as 1.99 ± 0.35 μg/ml and 9.48 ± 0.58 μg/ml, respectively. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Phenols, Alkaloids, COMT, Inhibition, Parkinson's disease, Alkaloids, Phenols, Parkinson's disease, COMT, Inhibition
Fields of Science
0301 basic medicine, 0303 health sciences, 03 medical and health sciences
Citation
Yalçın, D., and Bayraktar, O. (2010). Inhibition of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) by some plant-derived alkaloids and phenolics. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic, 64(3-4), 162-166. doi:10.1016/j.molcatb.2009.04.014
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
19
Volume
64
Issue
3-4
Start Page
162
End Page
166
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 18
Scopus : 23
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 27
Google Scholar™


