Aas, Xrpd, Sem/Eds, and Ftir Characterization of Zn2+ Retention by Calcite, Calcite–kaolinite, and Calcite–clinoptilolite Minerals
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In this study, the sorption behavior of Zn2+ on calcite, kaolinite, and clinoptilolite, in addition to mixtures of calcite with kaolinite and clinoptilolite, was investigated at various loadings and mixture compositions using atomic absorption spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, X-ray powder diffraction, and Fourier transform infrared techniques. According to the obtained results, within the experimental operating conditions, the sorption capacity was enhanced with increasing amount of calcite in both types of mixtures. Under neutral–alkaline pH conditions and high loadings, the order of Zn2+ retention was observed as calcite > clinoptilolite > kaolinite. The experiments on the retention of Zn2+ by pure calcite under conditions of oversaturation showed that the uptake process proceeds via an initial adsorption mechanism (possibly ion-exchange type) followed by a slower mechanism that leads to the overgrowth of the hydrozincite phase, Zn5(OH)6(CO3)2.
Description
Keywords
Zinc, Kaolinite, Clinoptilolite, Calcite, Hydrozincite, Hydrozincite, Zinc, Clinoptilolite, Kaolinite, Calcite
Fields of Science
02 engineering and technology, 0210 nano-technology, 01 natural sciences, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Citation
Shahwan, T., Zünbül, B., Tunusoğlu, Ö., & Eroğlu, Ahmet E. (2005). AAS, XRPD, SEM/EDS, and FTIR characterization of Zn2+ retention by calcite, calcite–kaolinite, and calcite–clinoptilolite minerals. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 286 (2), 471–478. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2005.02.047
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
44
Volume
286
Issue
2
Start Page
471
End Page
478
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 26
Scopus : 47
PubMed : 1
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 34
Google Scholar™


