Complex Coacervation of Silk Fibroin and Hyaluronic Acid
Loading...
Files
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the pH-induced complexation of silk fibroin (SF) and hyaluronic acid (HA). SF-HA complex coacervation was investigated by monitoring turbidity of the SF-HA system under slow acidification. Gravimetric analysis was performed to determine the yield of complex coacervation and viscosity of the system was measured to study the formation of the complexes at different pH values. The influences of total biopolymer concentration and biopolymer weight ratio on complex coacervation were examined during the analyses. Formation of the complexes was evidenced by the minimum viscosity and the maximum turbidity observed in the system. SF-HA complexes were formed within the pH-window of 2.5-3.5 regardless of the total biopolymer concentration or biopolymer ratio. Complex coacervation of SF-HA showed a reversible behavior and coacervation could be handled even in excess amounts of the biopolymers, which pointed out a non-stoichiometric complexation.
Description
Keywords
Complex coacervation, Hyaluronic acid, Protein-polysaccharide interactions, Silk fibroin, Electrophoresis, Viscosity, Hyaluronic acid, Silk, Titrimetry, Silk fibroin, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Biopolymers, Solubility, Nephelometry and Turbidimetry, Complex coacervation, Animals, Protein-polysaccharide interactions, Hyaluronic Acid, Fibroins
Fields of Science
0301 basic medicine, 02 engineering and technology, 03 medical and health sciences, 0210 nano-technology
Citation
Malay, Ö., Bayraktar, O., and Batıgün, A. (2007). Complex coacervation of silk fibroin and hyaluronic acid. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 40(4), 387-393. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2006.09.017
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
65
Volume
40
Issue
4
Start Page
387
End Page
393
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 46
Scopus : 70
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 93
SCOPUS™ Citations
70
checked on Apr 30, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
68
checked on Apr 30, 2026
Page Views
906
checked on Apr 30, 2026
Downloads
727
checked on Apr 30, 2026
Google Scholar™


