Structure and Performance Evaluation of Fractional Lower-Order Covariance Method in Alpha-Stable Noise Environments
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Background: All existing time delay estimation methods, i.e. correlation and covariance, depend on second or higher-order statistics which are inapplicable for the correlation of alpha-stable noise signals. Therefore, fractional lower order covariance is the most appropriate method to measure the similarity between the alpha-stable noise signals. Methods: In this paper, the effects of skewness and impulsiveness parameters of alpha-stable distributed noise on fractional lower order covariance method have been analyzed. Results: It has been found that auto-correlation, i.e. auto fractional lower order covariance, \ of non delayed alpha-stable noise signals follows a specific trend for specific ranges of impulsiveness and skewness parameters of alpha-stable distributed noise. The results also depict that, by maintaining the skewness and impulsiveness parameters of alpha-stable noise signals in a certain suggested range, better auto-correlation can be obtained between the transmitted and the received alpha-stable noise signals in the absence and presence of additive white Gaussian noise. Conclusion: The obtained results would improve signal processing in alpha-stable noise environment which is used extensively to model impulsive noise in many noise-based systems. Mainly, it would optimize the performance of random noise-based covert communication, i.e. random communication.
Description
WOS: 000460040900006
Fields of Science
0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Q4
Scopus Q
Q3

OpenCitations Citation Count
4
Source
Recent Advances in Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Volume
12
Issue
1
Start Page
40
End Page
44
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 6
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 2
SCOPUS™ Citations
6
checked on Jun 14, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
6
checked on Jun 14, 2026
Page Views
644
checked on Jun 14, 2026
Google Scholar™


